Services

Advisory Built Around 9 Pillars of Workforce Governance

Each engagement is scoped to your organization's current state. Our flagship service is the Governance Assessment — a three-week diagnostic of your AI-powered HR technology stack.

Request a Governance Assessment
Flagship Engagement

Governance Assessment

Our primary engagement. A three-week diagnostic of your AI-powered HR technology stack across nine governance pillars — delivered as a written findings report with a 90-day remediation roadmap. We assess your actual tools, actual regulatory exposure, and actual organizational structure. The output is specific, prioritized, and actionable.

3-week engagement
Nine-pillar framework
Written findings report
90-day roadmap
Regulatory exposure map
Stakeholder readout
Investment
$7,500 – $15,000
Based on company size · Contract + deposit required
Week 1
Discovery & Intake

Pre-engagement questionnaire, 90-minute discovery call with CHRO and HR Ops lead, tool inventory and documentation review.

Week 2
Nine-Pillar Assessment

Each pillar scored 1–4 on our maturity rubric. Evidence collected: vendor contracts, policy documents, tool configurations, compliance documentation.

Week 3
Findings, Report & Presentation

Written findings report (18–28 pages) plus a 60-minute prioritized readout with the CHRO and relevant stakeholders.

This is a professional service engagement. Cell9 qualifies, scopes, proposes, and contracts each assessment individually. There is no self-serve option.

Additional advisory services available upon consultation.

Request a Governance Assessment
AI Use Disclosure

How Cell9 Uses AI in Our Process

Cell9 uses AI-assisted tools to support research, regulatory cross-referencing, document analysis, and report drafting in the preparation of our assessments. AI accelerates the work of a knowledgeable advisor — it does not replace judgment or framework.

AI does not make maturity score determinations, author findings, or produce final client-facing content without substantive review and revision by our advisory team. The findings are ours. The methodology is ours. The accountability is ours.

Engagement Letter Disclosure

"Cell9 Talent Intelligence uses AI-assisted tools to support research, document analysis, and report drafting in the preparation of this assessment. All findings, maturity scores, and recommendations reflect the professional judgment of Cell9's advisory team and have been reviewed, validated, and approved by the engagement lead prior to delivery. AI tools do not independently determine findings or produce unreviewed client-facing content."

The Methodology

Intelligence-First vs. Manual Compliance

Manual compliance was designed for a simpler regulatory environment. These are the structural limitations of that approach — and where a governance-first methodology addresses them differently.

Capability
Traditional Manual Compliance
Cell9 Approach
Worker Classification Accuracy
Manual, inconsistent across teams
Structured framework applied uniformly across all classifications
Regulatory Change Response
Reactive — updates lag by weeks or months
Proactive monitoring with rapid remediation protocols
Audit Readiness
Documentation scattered across siloed systems
Compliance-ready documentation suite, continuously maintained
AI Tool Governance
No formal evaluation process; ad-hoc vendor trust
Structured bias + data governance review per tool
Vendor & MSP Oversight
Relationship-driven, limited performance data
Intelligence-backed vendor scoring and risk profiling
Contingent Workforce Visibility
Fragmented data, low confidence in headcount numbers
Unified workforce composition view across all worker types
Compliance Overhead
High — manual hours per audit cycle
Significantly reduced through systematized processes
Strategic Talent Intelligence
Rarely operationalized; data exists but goes unused
Embedded into leadership decision-making rhythms
ROI Calculator

What Could You Save with Better Governance?

Drag the sliders below to match your organization — the estimate updates instantly.

500
10,000 max
20%
≈ 100 workers60 max
10 hrs/wk
520 hrs/year · $44,200 in labor40 max
3
$150,000 exposure at avg. $50K/incident20 max
Estimated Annual Impact

Illustrative estimate based on industry benchmarks. Figures adjust dynamically with your inputs and are not a guarantee of results. Actual savings vary by organization, tools, and governance maturity.

Compliance Labor Saved
~312 hrs reclaimed
$26,520
Risk Exposure Reduced
Est. 75% reduction in misclassification liability
$112,500
Total Estimated Savings
$139,020
per year

Estimates based on industry averages: $85/hr labor cost, $50K avg. misclassification settlement. Actual results vary by organization. Cell9 clients typically see 50–70% reduction in compliance overhead within 12 months.

Book a Free Discovery Call
FAQ

Common Questions

Straight answers to the questions we hear most.

Every Engagement Starts with a Complimentary Discovery Call

No commitment required. Speak with a senior Cell9 advisor and get a clear view of your regulatory exposure before you sign anything.

Book a Complimentary Discovery Call
base44
Edit with Base44